Which type of static route includes both the exit interface and the next hop?

A fully specified static route is the correct choice because it provides all necessary details for routing decisions. Specifically, it includes both the exit interface and the next-hop IP address. This level of detail allows the router to efficiently determine how to forward packets without requiring further resolution regarding how to reach the next hop.

When a route is fully specified, it simplifies the routing process, as the router does not need to look up the next hop in its routing table to identify the exit interface. This is particularly useful in scenarios where direct connections or specific exit interfaces are critical for effective routing.

In contrast, a directly attached route typically refers to networks that are directly reachable through an interface but does not necessarily specify both the exit interface and next hop. Recursive routes involve a next hop that the router must resolve further, which means the exit interface is not explicitly outlined. Lastly, the term static route encompasses all static routing methods but does not specifically indicate whether the exit interface and next hop must both be included. Thus, a fully specified static route is distinct in its completeness.